amelialourdes: (qaf ; 304 thank you)

Thank you to [ profile] jenepherre for the lovely tulip v-gift, [ profile] weirdqafan, [ profile] suzvoy, and [ profile] plasticine_star for Frank's lunchbox! It makes my user info so much better to look at, ha. Really appreciate it, all!

Second. Stolen from somewhere. Who knows where.

Yeah, I've had my journal for seven years. Do any of my old flisters even remember?

amelialourdes: (qaf ; fic addict simjustin)

I'm not a writer. I don't consider myself one. I'm not really good at it. I think once upon a time I had an imagination and creativity to write but I think that I've lost it. That said, I've always received pretty high grades when it came to English, grammar, phonics, reading comprehension, language, etc. I consistently wrote in college and graduated with a degree that is based on literary and visual analysis. I think that I have a pretty firm grasp on the English language. That said, when I see badly written fan fiction? I cringe.

Bad fic? It happens. For whatever reason, people make up what they make up without any regard or consideration of the personality of the characters that they're using. They write what they write without care or acknowledgment of their own terrible spelling and grammar. They don't bother with betas because a few fawning reviews means that they have fans and it doesn't matter what the writing looks like.

That bothers me. It bothers me. Every time someone spells something wrong and it's posted for all to see, it makes the angels cry (quote courtesy of Quinn from Glee). Someone on my flist has recently spoken a lot about the writing process and writing in fandoms and her perceptions are dead on. It's refreshing to find someone who's receptive to critique and commentary about her work. Of course, it wasn't always that way. It's never that way in the beginning. In the beginning, I imagine that people do think that they're good writers and for whatever reason (I blame fawning reviews with no critique) aren't receptive to criticism.

Fandom is supposed to be fun, yes? The stories are just stories. They're not up for Pulitzers or even national writing contests. I understand that. This is just a major, major, MAJOR pet peeve of mine that I want to address for myself and to share with anyone who may feel the same. Or! Feel differently. I'm open to both ideas. I'm not having fun if a large chunk of a story doesn't make sense. I sometimes try to look past the errors to just read the story itself but then it's bad characterization that gets to me.

So, if you're a writer or if you're an active reader, what in fandom fanfiction bothers you if you're bothered by anything at all? No specific fandom here. Any fandom at all. What will turn you off of a story? If you're a writer, why do you/would you not accept constructive criticism? Are you open to constructive criticism?

amelialourdes: (randy ; barn)

Is there a difference between Gale fangirls and Randy fangirls? Discuss.

amelialourdes: (qaf ; teevee love)

For starters today, birthday question. Is it [ profile] lennongirl's birthday? Ani, if it's your birthday today or tomorrow or yesterday, happy birthday! I'm sure that you're doing something awesome over there at home. Hee.

Now in relation to Six Feet Under, as you know or don't know, I had a Six Feet Under marathon recently. I watched the series over a week and will probably be rewatching the episodes in the next few weeks to be able to digest more of it. It really is so poignant and so incredibly well-written and it probably has the best series finale that I've seen, ever. No weird fade to blacks, no last happy scene without knowing about what happened to them in the future. Charmed came close to this but of course not as powerful or insightful.

That said, there are a lot of issues brought up throughout the series but one in particular stood out to me. Lost recaps constantly observe that any time anyone on that show has an issue, it's usually a "Daddy Issue". Six Feet Under wasn't an exception. There was Keith's feelings toward his father. Nathaniel Sr. popped up throughout the entire series and the children analyzed their relationship with him. In Queer as Folk, Brian's father beat him and Michael never knew his father and Justin's dad disowned him.

Why do you think that television shows explore the father dynamic more than the mother dynamic? Is it more powerful to explore the more masculine dynamic? Is it just because fathers do often abandon their children or cause some kind of traumatic experience in childhood that continues to affect that child as an adult?

I'm always thinking about the parental dynamic in Disney movies because the fathers are almost always around and they kill the mothers. In movies that aren't animated, the girl raised by her father (without any siblings or female siblings) always appears as a tomboy because she hasn't had that female exposure. Disney female characters (princesses) seen so in touch with their femininity.

So, why is the paternal dynamic more prevalent in television?

amelialourdes: (qaf ; life sucks)

I'll get back to you tomorrow. It's been one of those days.

As a distraction, I'm reading fic. I've thought of two and I was wondering if anyone can point me in the right direction:

1) What's the fic where Brian hesitates when saying that he loves Justin? I think it's in the loft and Gus is there and he asks if Brian loves Justin and Brian hesitates for a moment so Justin's hurting a little because of that. It was kind of a short fic.

2) I think Justin was in a wheelchair and living in Brian's loft? I know that there were several dozen fics with wheelchairs but this one stands out for some reason. I think Brian freaked out when Justin's caretaker took him out for a walk? Now that I think about it this could be blind!Justin. Need some confirmation on this.

Would really appreciate it if anyone could help me out. Thanks.

amelialourdes: (bj ; save the last dance for me)

Who is the person in fandom who called the parking lot where Justin got hit "the parking lot of violent homophobia"? I laughed my ass off about five seconds ago just thinking about it. This was around 2004 and it may have been a TWoP recap but now I'm not too sure.

I thought about it because I'm reading my memories and it was a conversation that I had with my bestie. :)

amelialourdes: (disney ; old school disney)

... but the latest trends of High School Musical, Hannah Montana and the Jonas Brothers is absolutely driving me insane. I cannot wait until these fads are over so we never have to hear about them again except from the former teenyboppers who used to idolize them.

Sorry kids. Believe it or not it is a fad.

That said, this was an interesting article on the Hannah Montana Movie. I like to remain well informed. Now I have a question for those fellow Disney fans or just opinions in general: Why are Disney characters not allowed to have mothers AND fathers?

Some do. Princess Aurora had parents. But they didn't raise her or anything or I don't know if that really counts. There's still a giant disassociation that she has from them. Um, let's see. Anyone else? Oh! Mulan had a mother and a father. That was rare.

I know that generally these ideas stem from their original stories like Briar Rose and those stories stem from old folk stories. So, what is it about folk stories that took the children away from their parents. Was there a moral in there somewhere?

But newer, original Disney stories are also kind of lacking in family representations like Finding Nemo (the Mom was eaten), Meet the Robinsons (wanted to find adoptive mother), etc. I'm not asking that the nuclear family is represented in every film but you know ... at least some of them would be nice.

amelialourdes: (icon love ; stalkerz)

I know most of you watched the DVDs and bonus features. So, am I making this up or was there a feature with Bobby Gant in it which he was sitting at some restaurant with Chad Allen or someone else from his production team? I just vaguely remember it. And did they actually say where that place was? I just remember it was very, very noisy. Might've been Jerry's Deli.

amelialourdes: (qaf ; woe (my mac))

All right all. A little help please.

I just upgraded my browser to Firefox 3 and it's completely aesthetically unpleasant (wonder if that's the right way to say that). Um, I hate the way that it looks. I'm on a Mac and I didn't realize that your choices are EXTREMELY limited when it comes to changing your theme. I did not know that.

I admit, it's a lot faster than the old browser and I like the way that the text looks inside the window but the tabs are too damn dark and the top chrome back buttons, forward buttons, reload ... no. The fact that I can't change the way that it looks is aggravating.

So, two things:

1) How do I get Firefox 2 back?


2) Is there ANY theme out there for a Mac computer that isn't going to be chrome and that resembles the Firefox 2 default?


Jan. 3rd, 2009 04:57 pm
amelialourdes: (icon ; too much time on lj)

Is anyone else experiencing some kind of weird view on their LJ or is it just me?

Edit: Meh. Temporarily changing it until I just put in a new layout. :|


amelialourdes: (Default)

May 2016

8910111213 14


RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Sep. 26th, 2017 02:03 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios